
On the ancillary obligation to comply with the family protocol
An article of the bylaws establishing ancillary obligations whose specific and determined content does not appear in the article itself but by reference to the
Adapted to the needs of each client to provide a flexible and personalized support.
In the ruling of 18 January 2024, STS 214/2024, the Supreme Court considers that the omission of compliance with a provision in the Articles of Association, referring to the approval of the remuneration by the General Meeting, cannot automatically lead to the classification of the expense as a liberality and the inappropriateness of deductibility.
In this way, the SC places relevance on compliance in the accounting of the expense, as well as on the essence of the director’s remunerated activity, provided that the services are effectively rendered, as has been previously developed in the doctrine established in the STS 4594/2023 ruling of 2 November 2023.
The requirements necessary for the deductibility of the expense are also reiterated: (i) accounting registration, (ii) allocation on an accrual basis and (iii) documentary justification. Once the aforementioned requirements have been met, even if the expenses with an onerous cause have not been approved by the General Meeting, they will not be understood as a liberality and may be deducted, provided that the manner and amount of the remuneration can be deduced from the Articles of Association.
An article of the bylaws establishing ancillary obligations whose specific and determined content does not appear in the article itself but by reference to the
The Provincial Court of Madrid, in its Judgment 230/2024 of 2 July, analysed the validity of a notice of a general meeting of a limited
The Commercial Register does not allow the registration of proposals discussed at a shareholders’ general meeting that do not become resolutions due to tied votes,